|
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Fannie May Mint Meltaway
First of all, I never see Fannie May all the way out here in the West Coast. Second, this was a drug store, someplace I didn’t expect to run across a boxed chocolate brand. I know many readers have been urging me to cover Fannie May, so into my basket they went without complaint. Fannie May used to be a fine chocolate company, founded in 1920 and based in Chicago. In 2004 they declared bankruptcy and were bought up by Alpine Confections who already owned a similar Midwest confectioner, Harry London of Canton, OH. In 2006 they became part of 1-800-FLOWERS. So they’re not quite the tiny little boxed chocolate company any longer; this is what their website says:
So some of you caught that I said that they used to be fine chocolate. Well, read on and you’ll see where I take issue with including them saying they’re “fine chocolate” when they’re not using the “finest ingredients.” The Mint Meltaway package is rather refreshing and easy to spot. It’s a rather clinical white with a little pile of the candies isolated in the middle of the wrapper. The top and bottom edges have simple evergreen boughs and pine cone trim. There’s actually only one piece in the package though the image shows three, but at 1.5 ounces, it’s definitely not skimpy. The package describes the meltaway as Rich chocolate mint center drenched in creamy pastel coating. Wow, creamy pastel coating, can you tell how much my
You know what all that adds up to? 1.5 grams of trans fats. Most companies have mucked around with their serving sizes so that they can skirt in under the “you can say there’s no trans fats if you have less than .5 grams in a serving” but Fannie May, well, she’s bold. She’s out there with a huge 240 calorie portion (160 calories per ounce) that contains 49% of my daily value of saturated fats. And those actual trans fats. The block is two inches square and a half an inch high. The soft, matte & dull green looks like a bar of soap or a vintage fireplace tile. It has a soft peppermint scent, not menthol nasal-passages-clearing-strong. The white coating is rather smooth and not at all greasy. It’s not minty but also not really much of anything besides a texture and slightly salty. The chocolate center isn’t a soft meltaway, it’s a bit firmer, like a Frango. It melts quickly though, cool and chocolatey with a pleasant peppermint essence to it. After a while it gets a little greasy though, a little thin and watery. The ingredients don’t warrant the $1.39 price tag when I can get the Dove Peppermint Bark made with real cocoa butter just a little further down the aisle. Or if you don’t mind the mockolate, just eat some Andes Mints. Related Candies
|
||||||||||||||||||
ABOUT
FEEDSSEARCH
CONTACT
EMAIL DIGESTCANDY RATINGSTYPE
BRAND
COUNTRY
ARCHIVES
|
Meticulously photographed and documented reviews of candy from around the world. And the occasional other sweet adventures. Open your mouth, expand your mind.
|
|||||||||||||||||
I grew up in Chicago and Fannie May is “the” candy company around there (even though I think many of the outlets have closed over the past few years…) Now that I live in SoCal with easy access to See’s, it’s a wonder I ever liked Fannie May at all. Their candy just lacks a certain “pop,” and with ingredients like that, it’s easy to see why!
Incidentally this review is not appearing on your front page
You’ve got a bit of a typo in your review: “Wow, creamy pastel coating, can you tell how much my mother is watering at that?”
I love the Fannie May meltaways! They’re my favorite, second only to the Fannie May Trinidads. Maybe my love of them is simply due to the fact that I live in Chicago. Clearly, the ingredient quality can’t explain it.
For Fannie May, you MUST try the Trinidads. They’re a chocolate truffle core surrounded by toasted coconut embedded in white chocolate. Or something like that - chocolate on the inside, toasted coconut in yellowsish (not really as white as white chocolate) shell. I moved out of the midwest years ago, but Trinidads are easily the best thing they make. (ok, so the pixies are pretty awesome, too)
Of course, I moved out of the Midwest before the bankruptcy, so it’s probably turned to crap now. But Trinidads at least used to be amazing and were definitely a unique item.
Great article, but why did it not end up on the front page?
I got these at Walgreens as last moment “Santa” shopping for my mom, my sister, and I. The ingredients may not be great, but I still like them. Sure, not good for me, but YUM! I love them, and taste matters much more to me than if these “fine” ingredients are used. I find that those don’t always taste as good.
The problem is, you bought it at Walgreen’s. As a native Chicagoan, I do admit that the quality is not as good after bankruptcy. However, there is definitely a taste difference between the mint meltaways and pixies that I can get in Walgreen’s and the “real” ones that my family sends me from home. Real mint meltaways are much, much smaller. The giantness of the big one makes it gross right off the bat.
Thank you for this review. I am a native chicagoan who grew up on Fannie May. I was seriously bummed when they closed their doors for a while in 2004. When they opened again a year or so later, the candy was just not the same. The meltaways were not as melty, the buttercreams were not as buttery, the chocolate was not as chocolaty. I was so disappointed!
Then See’s opened a few stores in Chicagoland ... I gave them a try. Wow, fantastic! Do a comparison for yourself, Fannie May pales.
I lament that Fannie May, as I knew it, not longer exists, but See’s is helping me get over it
Next entry: Fannie May Pixie
Previous entry: Buchanan's Clotted Cream Fudge
Trackback URL: http://www.candyblog.net/trackback/2341